Articles
  • Synthesis of a new polystyrene@Fe3O4 magnetic microspheres
  • Yongping Xuea,b, Feng Jiana, Xuewen Zhongb, Lu Tangb,* and Xiaojun Yangc,*

  • aSchool of chemical Engineering & Pharmacy, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, China
    bThe College of Post and Telecommnication of Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, China
    cKey Laboratory of Green Chemical Process of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Novel Reactor and Green Chemical Technology of Hubei Province,School of Chemical Engineering & Pharmacy, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, Hubei, China

  • This article is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In this article, the synthesis process of magnetic polystyrene@Fe3O4 was investigated, which are suitable for the application in magnetically stabilized fluidized-bed reactors. The magnetic polystyrene@Fe3O4 coated with Fe3O4 were prepared by suspension polymerization. In the reaction, triethoxy(vinyl)silane, styrene, divinylbenzene, liquid paraffin, gelatin, benzoyl peroxides (BPO) were used as the surfactant, monomers, the crosslinking agent, a porogenic agent, a dispersant, an initiator, respectively. Simultaneously, the chemical composition, morphologies, particle sizes, the amount of Fe3O4 coated were analyzed. The samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) analysis and thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA). The results showed that the new type of magnetic polystyrene@Fe3O4 microspheres were porous, spherical in shape with a narrow particle size distribution in the range of 150~200 μm. The amount of Fe3O4 coating reached to 12.39%, and the maximum saturation magnetization was 51.71 A∙m2·kg-1 at room temperature. In addition, the results also showed that polystyrene@Fe3O4 magnetic microspheres have good acid resistance and good suspendability


Keywords: suspension polymerization, microspheres, Fe3O4, surface modification, coating

introduction

Magnetic polymer microspheres are a special type of magnetic and surface-functionalized microspheres, prepared by the combination of an organic polymer and an inorganic magnetic material [1-4]. They have a great potential in chemical engineering, biological, medical and environmental sciences. However, these magnetic polymer microspheres are easily to reunite due to their large specific surface areas and high surface energies. Therefore, surface modification by silane-based inorganic molecules and polyethylene glycol have often been used to prevent molecular reunion [5-7].
In recent years, more and more attention has been focused on the core-shell magnetic
composites with Fe3O4 nanoparticles as core and the polymer as shell [8]. For example, Denkbas
et al. prepared magneticchitosan nanoparticles by suspension crosslinking technology with the particle size of 100~200 μm [9]. Chen. et al. prepared magnetic polymethyl methacrylate nanoparticles by spray suspension polymerization, which were used hydrophobic Fe3O4 magnetofluid as the magnetic sub- stance [10]. Especially, the cerium ion-chelated magnetic silica microspheres were also synthesized, with an excellent performance [11].
According to a large amount of literature, there were little reports about polymer composite materials, which the polymer as the core and Fe3O4 nanoparticles as the shell. These materials not only have higher magnetism, but also were applied in more and more fields, such as chemical
catalysis, environmental engineering, medicine and biological engineering [12]. For example, in order to solve the problem of difficult separation and recovery of nano-catalysts, nano-scale catalysts were immobilized on the magnetic microspheres, which caused to be separated [13]. In addition, these magnetic microspheres were used to analy and detect the hydrazine content in waste water [14].
It can be inferred that these magnetic materials will be a kind of new and multifunctional materials. So in this article, a new type of magnetic polymer material was prepared through the suspension polymerization, which used polymer as the core of, iron oxide as the shell of. The magnetic materials will be applied in magnetically stabilized fluidized-bed reactors in the following work [15].

experimental

Materials
Fe3O4 (AR), triethoxy(vinyl)silane (SG-151, CP), poly- styrene (AR), divinylbenzene (AR), benzoyl peroxides (BPO, CP), paraffin (CP), gelatin (CP), Mg2SO4 (AR), Na2CO3 (AR) and other materials were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd.

Characterization
D8 ADVANCE X-ray powder diffractometer was used for analyzing the crystal structure of the samples. JSM-6700F Scanning Electron Microscope was used to detect the morphologies and microstructures of samples. Vibrating sample magnetometer was used to test the magnetic properties of the samples. Thermo gravimetric analysis was used to determine the amount of the Fe3O4 coated on the samples.

Surface modification of Fe3O4 nanoparticles
6.0 g of Fe3O4 nano-magnetic powder and 7.5 g triethoxy(vinyl)silane were transferred into a 500 mL three-necked flask, followed by addition of 175 mL absolute ethanol and 175 mL of distilled water. Sub- sequently, the above suspending solutions was shaking at 40 oC for 16 h under nitrogen atmosphere with stirring speed of 600 rpm. Finally, the solid obtained was washed by ethanol and deionized water repeatedly, and dried under vacuum at 60oC for 48 h.

Preparation of magnetic polystyrene@Fe3O4 micro- spheres
0.22 g of gelatin was taken in a 500 mL 3-necked round-bottomed flask and then 80 mL of distilled water was added and the mixture was allowed to soak for 12 h. The flask was then placed in a 35 oC water heating and the mixture was stirred at 600 rpm for 1 h, followed by sequential addition of 0.2 g of BPO, 7 mL divinylbenzene, 24 mL of styrene, and 11 mL liquid wax. This reaction was stirred for 30 min and heated up to 45 oC at a heating rate of 0.5 oC/min. 0.63 g of anhydrous sodium carbonate and 1.25 g of anhydrous magnesium sulfate were added, and raised temperature to 80 oC, lasted for 10 min, then 2.0 g of SG-151 modified Fe3O4 magnetic powder was added and reacted for 4 h. Increase the temperature to 95oC again and maintained for 2 h. Finally, waiting for the reaction dropped to 80 oC, washed and filtered with the deionized water of 60 oC, and then dried under vacuum for 24 h.

results and discussion

SEM analysis
Fig. 1 represents the SEM images of microsphere samples. S1~S2 represent polystyrene microsphere and S3~S4 stand for magnetic polystyrene@Fe3O4 microsphere. It can be obviously seen from Fig. 1 that the polystyrene microspheres had smooth surfaces with the sizes of 150 ~200 μm, which were sphere and better dispersion. At the same time, it can also be seen in the SEM images of S3~S4, the sizes of the polystyrene@Fe3O4 microspheres prepared were in the range of 150~250 μm, but the surface is uneven and black. Therefore, it can be said that the sizes of magnetic polystyrene@Fe3O4 microspheres were slightly larger than the polystyrene microspheres, and covered with small amounts of Fe3O4 nanoparticles.

X- ray diffraction analysis (XRD)
Fig. 2(a, b and c) represent the X-ray diffraction- patterns of polystyrene @Fe3O4 magnetic microspheres, Fe3O4 nanoparticles and polystyrene microspheres, respectively. It can be clearly seen from Fig. 2(a) and (b), both of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles and the synthetized polystyrene magnetic microspheres were showed the same diffraction peaks at 18.3o, 30.2o, 35.5o, 43.1o, 53.6o, 57.0o, and 62.8o. This result is consistent with the XRD patterns of Fe3O4 reported previously [12]. In additionally, it can be seen from Fig. 2(a) and (c) that there was a large dispersed diffraction peak at 20o, which is the typical diffraction peak for amorphous polystyrene. These results showed that Fe3O4 was not only coated on the surface of polystyrene, but also the crystal structures of Fe3O4 and polystyrene unchanged in the reaction.

FITR diffraction analysis (FTIR)
From Fig. 3, the absorption peaks are obviously seen at 3,439 cm-1 and 3,081 cm-1, they were the stretching peak of O-H adsorbed on the surface of microspheres. And while, the absorption peaks at 3,081 cm-1, 3,059 cm-1 and 3,025 cm-1, which were aromatic hydrogen on aromatic rings and the bending vibration of C-H; The absorption peaks at 2,922 cm-1 and 2,851 cm-1 represented the C-H on polystyrene main chain; The serial absorption peaks at 1,630 cm-1~1,452 cm-1 were the C=C on benzene; The absorption peaks at 697 cm-1and 757 cm-1 showed that it was a monosubstituted benzene. Especially, the absorption peaks at 537 cm-1 was the Fe-O of Fe3O4. All of these showed that the prepared magnetic microspheres contained polystyrene and Fe3O4. This results further illustrated that Fe3O4 had been coated on the surface of polystyrene.

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)
Fig. 4 represents the thermo gravimetric curves of magnetic polystyrene@Fe3O4 at a nitrogen atmosphere with a heating rate of 2 oC/min. It can be seen from Fig. 4 that the weight of magnetic polystyrene@Fe3O4 microspheres decreased for the reason of water and residual inorganics removed at below 200 oC. Moreover, it was found that the prepared polystyrene magnetic microspheres coated the higher amount of Fe3O4, which reached to 12.39%. However, in the reaction, if added the unmodified Fe3O4, the amount of Fe3O4 was only 7.35%. This result illustrated that Fe3O4 modified by surfactant (SG-151) was easier to be coated on the surface of polystyrene. It may be ascribed to the double bonds formed on the surface of the Fe3O4 in the during of the modified reaction, which could be better coated on the surface of polystyrene.

Analysis of magnetic properties (VSM)
Seen from the Fig. 5, the VSM diagram of the poly- styrene@SG-151-Fe3O4 magnetic microspheres was analyzed, used the modified Fe3O4 magnetic microspheres and polystyrene microspheres as the Controlled experi- ments. As can be obviously seen from Fig. 5, the saturated magnetic intensities of the prepared magnetic polystyrene@SG-151-Fe3O4 microspheres was reached to 51.71 A∙m2∙kg-1, which used the modified Fe3O4 in the reaction. But if used the unmodified Fe3O4, the saturated magnetic intensities was only 20.90 A∙m2∙kg-1. It can be seen that, the prepared magnetic polymeric materials in this study show higher magnetism and better superparamagnetism, if used the modified Fe3O4 during the preparation of magnetic polystyrene@Fe3O4 microspheres. Obviously, the saturated magnetic intensities of the polystyrene microspheres and the SG-151 modified Fe3O4 nano-magnetic were 1.59 A∙m2∙kg-1 and 71.97 A∙m2∙kg-1, respectively. This result showed that the magnetism of magnetic polystyrene microspheres significantly increased, if added SG-151 modified Fe3O4 nano-magnetic in the process of preparation. The saturated magnetic intensities of the prepared magnetic polystyrene@ SG-151-Fe3O4 microspheres was 32.52 times higher than the polystyrene microspheres, 2.47 times of the prepared magnetic polystyrene@Fe3O4 microspheres, approximately 80% of the SG-151 modified Fe3O4. It may be owed to the increased amount of Fe3O4 coating on the surface of polystyrene microspheres, resulting in the higher magnetic.

Acid resistance of magnetic microspheres
Fig. 6 represents the dissolution time of the prepared magnetic polystyrene@SG-151-Fe3O4 microspheres and SG-151 modified Fe3O4 nano-magnetic at different concentration of HCl. In the experiments, added 0.2 g magnetic polystyrene@SG-151-Fe3O4 microspheres and SG-151-Fe3O4 nanoparticles into different beakers contained 10 mL different concentration hydrochloric acid solution. After reacted for some time, all of the solution could be changed yellow, but the colour of the solutions (1mol/L-1HCl) were changed mostly slow. Seen from the figure 6, the solutions (1 mol/L-1HCl) changed to be yellow for 50 min and 1.27 min of the polystyrene@SG-151-Fe3O4 microspheres and SG-151-Fe3O4 nanoparticles, Respectively. It can be obviously seen that the acid resistance of the magnetic polystyrene microspheres more better than the SG-151-Fe3O4 nanoparticles. In especial, when the concentration of HCl is less than 3 mol∙L-1, the magnetic polystyrene microspheres have better acid resistance. So, it has more extensive application value.

Applications of magnetic microspheres
A certain amount of polystyrene magnetic microspheres was weighed and introduced into a magnetically stabilized fluidized bed. The bed was then vented and a U-shaped differential pressure gauge was used to determine the pressure drop of the bed. Meanwhile, the flow state of the bed layer was reflected by the changes in the pressure drops. The average of the gas phase holdup was measured by the changes in the liquid level of the bed [15, 16]. The suspension performances of polystyrene@ SG-151-Fe3O4 magnetic microspheres in magnetically stabilized fluidized bed reactor, before and after applying the magnetic field, are shown in Fig. 7.
Fig. 7(a) shows the suspension state of particles in magnetically stabilized fluidized bed atthe absence of magnetic field. From the Fig. 7(a), we can seen that uniformly dispersed magnetic polystyrene microspheres in the in the stabilized fluidized bed reactor. Fig. 7(b) shows the suspension of polystyrene@ SG-151-Fe3O4 magnetic microspheres, when a magnetic field formed in the fluidized bed with a voltage of 200 V. When the intensity of magnetic field reached to 2000 Oe, the polystyrene@ SG-151-Fe3O4 magnetic microspheres fast moved to the magnetic field zone in the magnetically stabilized fluidized bed reactor. According to the Fig. 7(a) and (b), it can be accounted that the polystyrene@ SG-151-Fe3O4 magnetic microspheres had better suspendability in the stabilized fluidized bed reactor without magnetic field, once under the magnetic field, the polystyrene magnetic microspheres shown better magnetism again. So, the prepared magnetic polystyrene @SG-151-Fe3O4 microspheres could expected to be applied to the magnetic catalysis field [16, 17].

Fig. 1

SEM images of samples,S1~S2 polystyrene microsphere; S3~S4 magnetic polystyrene@Fe3O4 microsphere.

Fig. 2

XRD patterns of polystyrene microspheres Fe3O4 namoparticles and polystyrene@Fe3O4 magnetic microspheres.

Fig. 3

FITR curves of the magnetic polystyrene@Fe3O4 microspheres.

Fig. 4

TGA curves of the magnetic polystyrene@Fe3O4 microspheres

Fig. 5

The VSM diagrams of the magnetic polystyrene microspheres.

Fig. 6

The acid resistance of the magnetic polystyrene microspheres.

Fig. 7

Suspension of polystyrene@Fe3O4 magnetic microspheres in a magnetically stabilized fluidized bed reactor

conclusions

In this paper, a new type of magnetic polymer material was prepared by suspension polymerization with Fe3O4 nanoparticles as the shell and polystyrene as the core. The experimental results showed that double bonds were present on the surfaces of Fe3O4 nanoparticles after modification by surfactant SG-151 leading to a better coating of these nanoparticles on the polymer material. The polystyrene@SG-151-Fe3O4 magnetic materials was spherical with uneven and black surface of the sizes 150~200 μm, and the better superparamagnetism. The amount of Fe3O4 coated on the magnetic polymer material reached 12.39%, and the highest saturation magnetization was 51.71 A∙m2∙kg-1. Meanwhile, polystyrene@Fe3O4 magnetic microspheres have good acid resistance and good suspendability. In the future, a reactor system suitable for the magnetically stabilized fluidized bed will be presented, for the mathematical modeling and a suitable reaction system will be simulated and established using the magnetic polystyrene microspheres as the catalyst [14].

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (20936003). We thank the center of testing and analysis, Wuhan Institute of Technology, and the the center of materials testing of Wuhan University of Technology for materials characterization.

References
  • 1. N. Guo, D.C. Wu, X.H. Pan, and M.L. Lu, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 112 (2009) 2383-2390.
  •  
  • 2. S.H. Hu, T.Y. Liu, H.Y. Huang, and S.Y. Chen, Langmuir 24 (2008) 239-244.
  •  
  • 3. H. Teymourian, A. Salimi, and S. Khezrian, J. Biosens. Bioelectron. 49 (2013) 1-8.
  •  
  • 4. J. Sun, Q. Liang, Q. Han, X. Zhang, and M. Ding, J. Talanta. 132 (2015) 57-63.
  •  
  • 5. G.F. Goya, Solid State Commun. 130 (2004) 783-787.
  •  
  • 6. R. Fan, H. Chen, Z. Gui, L. Liu, and Z.Y. Chen, Mater. Res. Bull. 36 (2001) 491-502.
  •  
  • 7. N.Z. Bao, L.M. Shen, Y.H. Wang, P. Padhan and A. Gupta J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129[41] (2007) 12374-12375.
  •  
  • 8. A.S. Patole, S.P. Patole, H. Kang,  J.-B. Yoo T.-H. Kim and J.-H. Ahn J. Colloid Interface Sci. 350[2] (2010) 530-537.
  •  
  • 9. D.E. Baki, K. Ebru, B. Cengiz, and O. Eylem, React. Funct. Polym. 50[3] (2002) 225-232.
  •  
  • 10. C. Xianyi, S. Yuanlin, Y. Dong, H. Jianhu, and Y. Pengyuan, Acta Chim. Sin. 70[7] (2012) 817-821.
  •  
  • 11. Y.H. Deng, C.C. Wang, X.Z. Shen, W. Yang, L. Jin, H. Gao, and S. Fu, Chem. A Eur. J. 11[20] (2005) 6006-6013.
  •  
  • 12. Y. Li, D.W. Qi, C.H. Deng, P. Yang, and X. Zhang, J. Proteome Res. 7[4] (2008) 1767-1777.
  •  
  • 13. S. Kumar, K. Balakrishna, G.P. Singh, and H.V. Batra, World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 21[5] (2010) 625-628.
  •  
  • 14. W. Lu, Y. Shen, W. Zhang et al. Preparation and drug-loading properties of Fe3O4/Poly(styrene-co-acrylic acid) magnetic polymer nanocomposites, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 11[345] (2013) 142-146.
  •  
  • 15. T. Lin, L. Mingyan, and H. Zongding. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50[6] (2011) 3598-3612.
  •  
  • 16. L. Dong E. Zhou L. Cai C. Duan Y. Zhao and Z. Luo, Energy Fuels 30[9] (2016) 7180-7186.
  •  
  • 17. B. Zhang, Y. Zhao, Z. Luo, S. Song, G. Li, and C. Sheng, Int. J. Coal Prep. Util. 34 (2014) 285-295.
  •  

This Article

  • 2021; 22(4): 441-445

    Published on Aug 31, 2021

  • 10.36410/jcpr.2021.22.4.441
  • Received on Jan 6, 2021
  • Revised on Mar 5, 2021
  • Accepted on Apr 19, 2021

Correspondence to

  • Lu Tang b,and Xiaojun Yang c
  • bThe College of Post and Telecommnication of Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, China
    cKey Laboratory of Green Chemical Process of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Novel Reactor and Green Chemical Technology of Hubei Province,School of Chemical Engineering & Pharmacy, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, Hubei, China
    Tel : +86-027-87194980 Fax: +86-027-87194980

  • E-mail: souproad@163.com (L. Tang), 10100201@wit.edu.cn (X