Articles
  • Effect of MgO addition on physico-chemical, mechanical and thermal behaviour of Al/Si3N4 composite material developed via hybrid casting technique
  • Shashi Prakash Dwivedia,*, Ashok Kumar Mishrab and V. R. Mishraa

  • aG. L. Bajaj Institute of Technology & Management, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddha Nagar, U.P., India
    bMechanical Engineering Department, SRM University, Sonipat, Haryana, India

Abstract

In the present investigation, aluminium based composite material developed by using Si3N4 as primary reinforcement material and MgO as secondary reinforcement material by hybrid casting techniques. The microstructure of composite developed by hybrid casting technique showed a uniform distribution of Si3N4 and MgO particles in the AA2024 aluminium alloy. Maximum tensile strength and hardness were found to be 214.5 MPa and 78 BHN for heat-treated AA2024/7.5% Si3N4/5% MgO composite material. Minimum thermal expansion was also found for AA2024/7.5% Si3N4/5% MgO composite material. However, minimum corrosion loss was found for AA2024/10% Si3N4/2.5% MgO composite material. Though, toughness and ductility were reduced by adding the Si3N4 and MgO particles in AA2024 aluminium alloy. XRD analysis of AA2024/7.5% Si3N4/5% MgO composite material was also observed to see the effect of Si3N4 and MgO particles addition in AA2024 aluminium alloy.


Keywords: Wettability; XRD; Thermal expansion; Corrosion loss; Si3N4, MgO

introduction

Aluminium based metal matrix composites are used in various industrial application where high specific strength and low corrosion rate materials are required. Its demand in aircraft industries and automobile industries is mainly due to its low cost of processing and a broad range of properties [1]. Aluminium based metal matrix composite (AMC) has been used in the design of specific aerospace and automotive components such as ventral fins, fuel excess door covers, rotating blades sleeves, gear parts, crankshafts, and suspension arms [2]. Among all aluminium alloys, AA2024 alloy is broadly used in aircraft industries in making wing and fuselage structure under simple tension because of its high fatigue, and tensile strength. The major component of AA2024 aluminium alloy is copper. The copper provides substantial increases in strength and facilitates precipitation hardening. The introduction of copper to aluminium also reduces corrosion resistance. The susceptibility to solidification cracking of aluminium-copper alloys is increased [3].
Magnesia or magnesium oxide (MgO) is an alkaline earth metal oxide. It is obtained from the calcination of naturally occurring minerals. Other important sources of magnesium oxide are seawater, underground deposits of brine and deep salt beds where magnesium hydroxide [Mg(OH)2] is processed [4]. Magnesium is the eighth-most abundant element and equals about two per cent of the earth's crust and typically 0.12% of seawater. Both MgCO3 and Mg(OH)2 are converted to MgO by calcinations [5]. It has an empirical formula of MgO and consists of a lattice of Mg2+ ions and O2− ions held together by ionic bonding. Magnesium hydroxide forms in the presence of water (MgO + H2O → Mg(OH)2), but it can be reversed by heating it to separate moisture [6]. Silicon nitride (Si3N4) is a chemical compound of the elements silicon and nitrogen. It is the most thermo-  dynamically stable of the silicon nitrides. Si3N4 is prepared by heating powdered silicon between 1,300 oC and 1,400 oC in a nitrogen environment by chemical reaction (3Si+2 N2 → Si3N4). Si3N4 contains silicon (Si) [7]. The addition of silicon (present in Si3N4) to aluminium during casting reduces melting temperature and improves fluidity. Si3N4 alone in aluminium produces a non-heat-treatable aluminium based composite material; however, in combination with MgO enhanced precipitation hardening of aluminium based composite material. The addition of MgO and Si3N4 to aluminium produces the compound magnesium-silicide (Mg2Si) [8]. The formation of this compound enhanced the heat treatable property of aluminium based composite material.
In conventional development of composite material by the mechanical stir casting technique, some porosity developed inside the solidified composite. While, during the development of metal matrix composite via electromagnetic stir casting technique, most of the ceramic particles settled down at the bottom of the solidified composite. Resulting, agglomeration of reinforcement particles was observed. However, in the electromagnetic stir casting process, very less amount of porosity developed inside the composite. Keeping these facts in the mind, In the present investigation, an attempt was made to develop the Si3N4 and MgO reinforced composite via hybrid casting techniques to avoid agglomeration of reinforcement particles and minimize the porosity. In the hybrid casting process, composite material developed by stir casting process, then in mushy zone transferred to electromagnetic stir casting process to obtain final composite. Wettability of composite materials refers to the interaction between reinforcement particles and matrix material. Good interfacial reaction layer between the matrix material and reinforcement particles indicates proper wettability [9]. Proper wettability between reinforcement and matrix material always play a significant role in enhancing the mechanical properties. It was observed from the literature that by using MgO powder as reinforcement material in aluminium base matrix, mechanical properties such as tensile strength and hardness were much improved [10]. MgO powder also enhanced the wettability of aluminium based composite material with reinforcement particles. Keeping these facts in the mind, in this study, MgO powder is used as a secondary reinforcement material with Si3N4 in development of aluminium based composite material [11].
Table 1 shows the summary of composite material developed by MgO and Si3N4 reinforcement particles. Some researchers (Table 1) developed aluminium based hybrid composite material by using Si3N4 as primary reinforcement material and ceramic particles such as Gr, AlN, ZrB2, Al2O3 etc. as secondary reinforcement material. In the same way, some researchers (Table 1) developed aluminium based hybrid composite material by using MgO as primary reinforcement material and ceramic particles such as Al2O3 as secondary reinforce-  ment material. But, from archival literature, it was observed that no researcher used MgO powder and Si3N4 particles together in the development of aluminium-based hybrid composite material by hybrid casting technique. Keeping these facts in the mind; in the present investigation, MgO powder was added as a supplementary reinforcement in Al/Si3N4 composite to enhance wettability property. Properties such as tensile strength, hardness, toughness, ductility, thermal expansion and corrosion test were carried out to observe the MgO addition effect in Al/Si3N4 composite material. Heat treatment of composite material was carried out to enhance further mechanical properties of the composite.

Table 1

Composite material developed by MgO and Si3N4 reinforcement particles.

materials and methods

Experimental procedure
In this study, AA2024 is considered as a matrix material. Measured mechanical properties of AA2024 alloy are shown in Table 2. Silicon Nitride (Si3N4) is considered as a primary reinforcement material. Silicon nitride (Si3N4) attributes an excellent combination of various properties. It is almost light as silicon carbide (SiC), but it gives excellent thermal shock resistance to material [12]. Fracture toughness of traditional ceramic particles such as SiC, Al2O3 and B4C is very low. Fracture toughness of silicon nitride (Si3N4) is high as compared to SiC, Al2O3 and B4C. Magnesium oxide (MgO) particles were considered as a secondary reinforcement material to enhance further mechanical properties of composites.
Fig. 1(a) shows a schematic diagram of the stir casting technique. Matrix material was heated in muffle furnace up to 750 oC. Preheated reinforcement particles (Si3N4 and MgO) were added in matrix material at the temperature 700 oC. Stir casting process involves stirring of melt composite material, in which the melt matrix material with reinforcement particles is stirred which exposes the melt composite material surface to the atmosphere which tends to continuous oxidation of aluminium melt. Resulting, the wettability of the reinforcement particles with aluminium reduces and the reinforcement particles remain unmixed. Therefore adding wetting agents such as TiK2F6, borax and magnesium in the melt is an alternate solution of this problem and widely used for the fabrication of aluminium based composite material. In this study, MgO was added in Al/Si3N4 composite material. Fig. 1(a) shows the microstructure of composite material obtained from stir casting technique. Non-uniform distribution of reinforcement particles in matrix material was observed by using stir casting technique.
Fig. 1(b) shows a schematic diagram of the electro-       magnetic stir casting technique. AA2024 aluminium alloy was heated in muffle furnace above its liquidus temperature (650 oC). Si3N4 and MgO reinforcement particles were also preheated before mixing to avoid wettability problem. Melt AA2024 matrix material was poured into a graphite crucible for stirring by the electromagnetic field of the motor. The traditional EMS (electromagnetic stirring) process mainly works in the mushy zone of the alloy, i.e., supercooled + EMS. There are two hypotheses to explain the formation mechanism of non-dendrites, that is, mechanical fragmentation and the root remelting of the dendrite arms [29]. The homogenization of the temperature and constituents caused by the forced convection during stirring can prompt the nucleation of the primary α-Al phase and restrain the growth of dendrites. The argon gas was used during the mixing of reinforcement particles in the melt of AA2024 alloy. Fig. 1(b) shows the microstructure of composite developed by electromagnetic stir casting technique. Less amount of porosity was observed. However, some agglomeration of reinforcement particles was also identified [30].
Fig. 1(c) shows the hybrid casting technique. Firstly, preheated reinforcement particles were mixed in the stir casting process at parameters shown in Table 3. After mixing the reinforcement particles in mechanical stir casting, composite in the mushy zone was transferred to electromagnetic stir casting route. Here, a mixed composite material in the mushy zone was stirred by the electromagnetic field [31]. Table 4 shows the parameters at which hybrid composite material was prepared. Uniform microstructure with less porosity was obtained by the development of hybrid casting technique process. Hence, the entire composite for this study was prepared by the hybrid casting technique as shown in Table 5.
Precipitations hardening process
The precipitations hardening process is used to improve the yield strength of composite as well as other properties such as hardness and fatigue strength. Schematic diagram of the precipitation-hardening process is shown in Fig. 4. Precipitation hardening process was carried out in three different phases. Firstly, the solutionizing process was done at a temperature of 530 oC for 4.5 hours and then quenched in a hot bath at temperature 70 oC. In muffle furnace ageing process was carried out for 13.5 hours [32].
Mechanical characterizations and sample preparation
The developed composites were characterized in terms of microstructure, tensile strength, hardness (10 mm x 10 mm x 25 mm), toughness (10 mm x 10 mm x 55 mm with 45o V notch at center of 2 mm depth according to ASTM A370 standard), thermal expansion and corrosion loss and XRD of composite. The tensile sample was prepared on a lathe machine. The tensile samples were tested at room temperature. Tensile samples were prepared according to ASTM B557 standard (Test methods for tension testing wrought and cast aluminium and magnesium-alloy products). The diameter of the sample prepared was 6 mm and the gauge length was 36 mm. Flow chart of experimental techniques followed for the present study is shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Development of composite by; (a) Stir casting technique, (b) Electromagnetic stir casting technique, (c) Hybrid casting technique.

Fig. 4

SEM image of upper surface composite developed by; (a) mechanical stir casting technique, (b) electromagnetic stir casting technique, (c) hybrid stir casting technique, (d) hybrid stir casting technique after heat treatment.

Fig. 3

Flow chart of experimental techniques followed.

Fig. 2

Heat treatment process of composites [32].

Table 2

Measured properties of AA2024 alloy.

Table 3

Stir casting parameters for the development of composite.

Table 4

Electromagnetic stir casting process parameters [33].

Table 5

Composite developed by the hybrid casting technique.

results and discussion

Microstructure analysis
Microstructure analysis was carried out to identify the distribution of reinforcement particles in the matrix material. MgO powder was used to enhance wettability property of aluminium based composite with Si3N4 reinforcement particles. However, MgO was also responsible to improve tensile strength and hardness of composites. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is used to observe the distribution of reinforcement particles. Fig. 4(a) shows the microstructure of composite (upper layer) developed by stir casting technique. It can be observed that most of the reinforcement particles are settled down at the bottom. Porosity and cracks can be seen inside the composite developed through mechanical stir casting technique. Fig. 4(b) shows the microstructure of the composite developed by the electromagnetic stir casting process. However, less amount of porosity and cracks were observed in composites developed via electromagnetic stir casting process. But, in this process also most of the ceramic particles were settled down at the bottom. Fig. 4(c) shows the microstructure of composite developed through hybrid casting technique. In this technique; firstly, reinforcement materials were mixed in melt matrix material by mechanical stir casting technique. When reinforcement particles were mixed properly by a stirrer, then composite with crucible in the mushy zone was transferred to the electromagnetic stir casting process. Composite material began to rotate in the mushy zone by the electromagnetic force produced developed from magnetic flux. The obtained composite material showed the proper distribution of reinforcement because in mushy zone reinforcement materials were not able to settle down at the bottom. Further, the grain structure of composite material was also improved as shown in Fig. 4(c). In this study, MgO powder was used as a secondary reinforcement material. MgO powder is also responsible in minimization of porosity and inclusion inside the composite. Fig. 4(d) shows that the grain structure of the composite more refined after the heat-treatment process. Microstructure image showed that the hybrid casting technique showed better results as compared to other technique. Hence, for further study, the hybrid casting technique is used to develop aluminium based composite material reinforced with MgO powder Si3N4 ceramic particles.
Tensile strength analysis
Fig. 5 shows the tensile strength of Si3N4 and MgO reinforced AA2024 aluminium-based hybrid metal matrix composite developed through hybrid casting technique. It was observed that by increasing the percentage of Si3N4 in AA2024/MgO composite tensile strength is continuously increases. The addition of magnesium oxide (MgO) to AA2024/Si3N4 composite increases strength through solid solution strengthening and improves their strain hardening ability. But, much higher content of MgO is not the dominant mechanism for densification. It is likely that the extra MgO is located in the grain boundaries and acts as a grain growth inhibitor [13]. Hence, beyond the 5% of MgO addition in AA2024/Si3N4 composite, tensile strength began to decreases. Maximum tensile strength was found to be 204 MPa for AA2024/7.5 wt% Si3N4/5 wt% MgO hybrid metal matrix composite. AA2024 is a good heat treatable material. Keeping this fact in the mind, heat treatment of composite material was also carried out in this study. It was observed that the tensile strength of composite significantly improved after the heat treatment process. Tensile strength was further improved after the heat treatment process of AA2024/7.5 wt% Si3N4/5 wt% MgO composite material. In this study, MgO powder was used to enhance the wettability of Si3N4 with AA2014 aluminium alloy.
N. Mathan Kumar et al. [12] mixed Si3N4 (Silicon Nitride), AlN (Aluminium Nitride) & Zrb2 (Zirconium Boride) with wt.% of (0,2,4,6,8) in Al 2618 aluminium alloy. Ultimate tensile strength of Al 2618 was 440 MPa. Ultimate tensile strength of Al 2618 with 8 wt.% reinforcement was 493 MPa. Results showed that 12.045% tensile strength improved. While in the present study, after the addition of 7.5% Si3N4 and 5% MgO in AA2024 aluminium alloy, about 13.33% tensile strength was improved with respect to the base metal. It was also notified that after the heat treatment of AA2024/7.5% Si3N4/5% MgO, about 19.16% tensile strength was improved. MgO has adequate atmospheric resistance and moderate strength. Magnesium (Mg) also enhanced the castability of the composite. MgO powder addition in aluminium has also improved the wettability of reinforcement particles with the aluminium matrix material.
Hardness analysis
Fig. 6 shows the hardness of AA2024/Si3N4/MgO hybrid metal matrix composite before and after heat treatment developed by hybrid casting technique. Hardness is increased by increasing the weight percent of MgO powder up to 5% in AA2024/7.5% Si3N4 composite. XRD results (Fig. 11) shows the presence of hard phases such as Si3N4, Fe2O3 and MgO in AA2024/7.5% Si3N4/5% MgO composite material. Presence of these phases was responsible for enhancing the hardness of the composite. Proper wettability and uniform distribution of reinforcement particles in a matrix material were also played a significant role in enhancing the hardness of the composite. When Si3N4 and MgO particles increase beyond 7.5% and 5% respectively in AA2024 alloy, hardness began to decreases. Air is interrupted inside the composite material with reinforcement particles when weight percent of reinforcement increases (beyond 7.5% for Si3N4 and 5% for MgO). Maximum hardness was found to be 73 BHN of AA2024/7.5% Si3N4/5% MgO hybrid metal matrix composite.
N. Mathan Kumar et al. [12] showed that by using Si3N4 with AlN and Zrb2 as reinforcement in Al 2618 aluminium alloy, about 48.33% hardness increased. The present study showed that about 37.73% hardness enhanced by using 7.5% Si3N4 and 5% MgO in AA2024 alloy. The hardness of the composite was further improved after the heat treatment process. After the heat treatment process, about 62.5% hardness was improved with respect to the base metal.
Toughness
Results show that MgO addition in AA2024/Si3N4 composite enhanced the tensile strength and hardness of composite hybrid casting technique. So, samples developed by the hybrid casting technique were considered for further study. Fig. 7 shows the impact strength of AA2024/Si3N4/MgO hybrid metal matrix composite. Silicon nitride (Si3N4) is a material with high fracture toughness and excellent thermal shock resistance. MgO powder addition in AA2024/ /Si3N4 composite influence the grain boundary mobility, surface diffusivity along with higher pore mobility of grains and grain boundary anisotropy of composite material. However, It can be observed from the analysis that toughness is continuously decreased by increasing the percentage of Si3N4 in AA2024/MgO composite [13]. The toughness of all the compositions was improved after the heat treatment process.
Ductility
Ductility of hybrid metal matrix composite was also observed to the find out the percentage elongation of the composite. Percentage elongation was calculated on extensometer during tensile testing. ASTM B557 standard was used to prepare the tensile samples. Magnesium oxide (MgO) has low ductility. It also shows unusual behaviour, such as a regime of increasing strength with increasing temperature, which is the opposite of most metals. Fig. 8 shows the ductility of AA2024/Si3N4/MgO hybrid metal matrix composite. Results showed that the ductility of the hybrid composite was also decreased by increasing the percentage of Si3N4 in AA2024/MgO composite material. The heat treatment effect was also observed in the ductility samples. Purple deviation bars show the enhancement of ductility after the heat treatment process.
Corrosion behaviour
Tensile strength and hardness results showed that MgO addition in AA2024/Si3N4 composite provides better results as compared to without addition of MgO in AA2024/Si3N4 composite. Hence, in this study, the corrosion behaviour of AA2024/Si3N4/MgO hybrid composite was observed. Corrosion test of all the samples was carried out in 3.5 wt.% NaCl for 120 hours. Weight of each sample was taken 9 mg to make uniformity for the corrosion test. Fig. 9 shows the corrosion weight loss of hybrid metal matrix composite. Minimum corrosion loss was found to be 0.06 mg for AA2024/10% Si3N4/2.5% MgO composite material.
Thermal expansion behaviour
Thermal expansion property of each green composite material was identified to observe the appropriateness of material in a high-temperature environment. Dimension (Volume: 2,500 mm3 (25 ´ 10 ´ 10)) of each sample was kept constant. Thermal expansion test was carried out for 72 hours at 450 oC in a muffle furnace. Thermal expansion behaviour of AA2024/Si3N4/MgO hybrid composite was observed. Fig. 10 shows the thermal expansion result of hybrid metal matrix composite. Minimum volume difference was found to be 8 mm3 for AA2024/7.5% Si3N4/5% MgO hybrid composite material. Si3N4 exhibits an unusually low coefficient of thermal expansion, which is a useful property for designers working with high-temperature applications.
XRD Analysis
XRD of AA2024/7.5% Si3N4/5% MgO hybrid metal matrix composite was observed to identify the various phases form during the development of composite material. Phases such as Al, Si3N4, Fe2O3 and MgO were found at angles (2ϴ degree) 44o, 50o, 75o and 90o respectively as shown in Fig. 11. Formation of these phases may be responsible for increasing the tensile strength and hardness of AA2024/7.5% Si3N4/5% MgO hybrid metal matrix composite material.

Fig. 5

Tensile strength of composite materials.

Fig. 6

Hardness of composite materials.

Fig. 11

XRD Analysis of AA2024/7.5% Si3N4/5% MgO hybrid metal matrix composite.

Fig. 7

Toughness of hybrid composite.

Fig. 8

Ductility of hybrid composite.

Fig. 9

Corrosion weight loss of hybrid composite.

Fig. 10

Thermal expansion of hybrid composite.

conclusions

Following conclusions can be drawn from the analysis.
1. AA2024 aluminium base composite material successfully developed by using Si3N4 as primary reinforcement material and MgO as a secondary reinforcement material by hybrid casting technique.
2. Microstructure results showed the uniform distribution and proper wettability of Si3N4 ceramic particles in AA2024 aluminium alloy by adding MgO particles in composite material.
3. Maximum tensile strength and hardness were found to be 204.5 MPa and 72 BHN for AA2024/7.5% Si3N4/5% MgO composite material. Results showed that tensile strength and hardness increased about 19.16% and 62.5% with respect to base metal AA2024 aluminium alloy after the heat-treatment process.
4. Toughness and Ductility were continuously decreased by adding the Si3N4 and MgO particles in AA2024 aluminium alloy.
5. Minimum corrosion loss was found to be 0.06 mg for AA2024/10% Si3N4/2.5% MgO composite material. Similarly, Minimum volume difference was found to be 8 mm3 for AA2024/7.5% Si3N4/5% MgO hybrid composite material.
6. XRD of AA2024/7.5% Si3N4/5% MgO hybrid metal matrix composite showed the formation of Al, Si3N4, Fe2O3 and MgO phases at angles (2ϴ degree) 44o, 50o, 75o and 90o respectively.

References
  • 1. C.-D. Lee, Materials Science and Engineering: A 559 (2013) 496-505.
  •  
  • 2. S. Shekhar, R. Sarkar, S.K. Kar, and A. Bhattacharjee, Materials & Design 66 (2015) 596-510.
  •  
  • 3. S.K. Patel, B. Kuriachen, N. Kumar, and R. Nateriya, Ceramics International 44 (2018) 6426-6432.
  •  
  • 4. B. Fan, S. Zhu, H. Ding, Y. Bai, Y. Luo, and P. Di, Materials Chemistry and Physics 238 (2019) 121907.
  •  
  • 5. H. Liu, L. Chen, and L. Ji, Journal of Hazardous Materials 376 (2019) 125-132.
  •  
  • 6. S. Wang, M. Li, S. Zhang, S. Fang, and D. Wang, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 479 (2019) 121-125.
  •  
  • 7. M. Li, L. Cheng, R. Mo, F. Ye, and X. Yin, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 798 (2019) 280-289.
  •  
  • 8. C. Yu, J. Ding, C. Deng, H. Zhu, and N. Peng, Ceramics International 44 (2018) 1104-1109.
  •  
  • 9. J. H. Li, J. Barrirero, G. Sha, H. Aboulfadl, F. Mücklich, and P. Schumacher, Acta Materialia 108 (2016) 207-218.
  •  
  • 10. R. Chen, Q. Xu, Z. Jia, and B. Liu, Materials & Design 90 (2016) 1059-1068.
  •  
  • 11. M. G. Mueller, M. Fornabaio, and A. Mortensen, Journal of Material Science 52 (2017) 858-868.
  •  
  • 12. N. M. Kumar, S. S. Kumaran, and L.A. Kumaraswamidhas, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 672 (2016) 238-250.
  •  
  • 13. R. Ambigai and S. Prabhu, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 27 (2017) 986-997.
  •  
  • 14. Q. Xu, X. Ma, K. Hu, T. Gao, and X. Liu, Materials Science and Engineering: A 726 (2018) 113-119.
  •  
  • 15. R. Ambigai and S. Prabhu, Measurement 146 (2019) 736-748.
  •  
  • 16. C. Zhang, Y.-P. Zeng, D. Yao, J. Yin, K. Zuo, Y. Xia, and H. Liang, Journal of Materials Science & Technology 35 (2019) 1345-1353.
  •  
  • 17. C. Zhang, D. Yao, J. Yin, K. Zuo, Y. Xia, H. Liang, and Y.-P. Zeng, Wear 430-431 (2019) 145-156.
  •  
  • 18. Q. Xu, K. Hu, X. Ma, T. Gao, and X. Liu, Materials Science and Engineering: A 733 (2018) 211-219.
  •  
  • 19. P. Jiang, X. Wu, W. Xue, J. Chen, W. Wang, and Y. Li, Ceramics International 43 (2017) 1335-1340.
  •  
  • 20. C. Zhang, J. Yin, D. Yao, K. Zuo, Y. Xia, H. Liang, and Y. Zeng, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 102 (2017) 145-153.
  •  
  • 21. A. Lotfy, A.V. Pozdniakov, V.S. Zolotorevskiy, M.T. Abou El-khair, A. Daoud, and A.G. Mochugovskiy, Materials Characterization 136 (2018) 144-151.
  •  
  • 22. E. Ghasali, A. Bordbar-Khiabani, M. Alizadeh, M. Mozafari, M. Niazmand, H. Kazemzadeh, and T. Ebadzadeh, Materials Chemistry and Physics 225 (2019) 331-339.
  •  
  • 23. Y. Sun, Y. Li, H. Li, M. Yan, S. Tong, and J. Sun, Ceramics International 44 (2018) 3987-3992.
  •  
  • 24. M. Yan, Y. Li, H. Li, Y. Sun, H. Chen, C. Ma, and J. Sun, Ceramics International 44 (2018) 3856-3861.
  •  
  • 25. M. Pul, R. Çalin, and F. Gül, Materials Research Bulletin 60 (2014) 634-639.
  •  
  • 26. K.V. Sreenivasa Rao, and Govindaraju, Materials Today: Proceedings 4 (2017) 11096-11101.
  •  
  • 27. H. Abdizadeh, R. Ebrahimifard, and M. A. Baghchesara, Composites Part B: Engineering 56 (2014) 217-221.
  •  
  • 28. S.M. Latifi, J. Bakhshi Azghandi, A. Salehirad, and M. Parvini, Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 25 (2017) 1329-1334.
  •  
  • 29. R. Mohammadi Badizi, M. Askari-Paykani, A. Parizad, and H.R. Shahverdi, Inter Metalcast 12 (2018) 565-573.
  •  
  • 30. G. Eisaabadi and A. Nouri, Inter Metalcast, 12 (2018) 292-297.
  •  
  • 31. S. Ordóñez, O. Bustos, and R. Colás, Inter, Inter Metalcast, 3 (2009) 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03355451.
  •  
  • 32. S.P. Dwivedi, S. Sharma, and R.K. Mishra, Journal of Composite Materials 51 (2017) 4261-4271.
  •  
  • 33. S. P. Dwivedi, S. Sharma, and R. K. Mishra, Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 37 (2015) 57-67.
  •  

This Article

  • 2019; 20(6): 632-642

    Published on Dec 31, 2019

  • 10.36410/jcpr.2019.20.6.632
  • Received on May 31, 2019
  • Revised on Aug 12, 2019
  • Accepted on Sep 26, 2019

Correspondence to